Samsung Galaxy S9 review: predictably great, predictably flawed

There comes a indicate in many successful products’ existences where they spin predictable. The new model, building off of a triumphs of a before version, maintains a same demeanour and feel while introducing some-more pointed enhancements. Apple’s used this hook with a iPhone and iPad for mixed generations, and Microsoft has finished a same with a Surface Pro in new years. Don’t stone a boat; don’t repair what isn’t broken.

And so, if you’ve seen final year’s Galaxy S8 from Samsung, you’ve seen this year’s Galaxy S9. Content with a pattern and coming of a S8, Samsung focused a efforts on small, mostly secret changes that outcome in a softened altogether experience, yet not a dramatically opposite one. Of course, Samsung being Samsung, there are a garland of new gimmicky facilities congested into it so there’s something to uncover on commercials.

That isn’t to contend a Galaxy S9 and a incomparable S9 Plus are bad phones; a S8 was an glorious phone final year, and a S9 builds on that. If you’re formulation to buy a new phone in 2018 and are peaceful to spend between $700 and $900 (the unbarred S9 sells for $719.99, while a S9 Plus goes for $839.99; conduit pricing varies), a S9 or S9 Plus will positively be one of a best options available. They will be a many renouned Android smartphones expelled this year, yet a doubt.

But 3 years on from Samsung’s big change in design, we know what a reward Samsung phone is already. It’s predicted — both a good things (display, design) and a bad things (software). The Galaxy S9 is a many predicted Samsung phone yet.


The design, display, and specs of a S9 move 0 surprises, yet they are a things that change your day-to-day use of a phone some-more than anything else. For a many part, Samsung nailed a basics.

Though a altogether pattern and coming of a S9 span are a same as a S8’s, it’s no reduction appealing or considerable to demeanour at. Even hardened tool bloggers, like Verge editor-in-chief Nilay Patel, were still tender with a S9’s coming when we initial showed it to them. The phone has a seamless, forever pool outcome that, total with a extra-tall aspect ratio display, creates it feel like you’re usually holding a screen.

There is winding potion on both a front and behind that creates a phone gentle to reason and allows it to be narrower than other phones with identical distance screens. Like final year, both a S9 and S9 Plus have winding screens; we can’t buy a prosaic chronicle of possibly one. My censure with a pattern is a same as any other glass-backed phone: it can be sleazy to hold, is a terrible fingerprint magnet, and is reduction durable than a steel behind would be.

But it positively is pretty.

The displays in a S9 and S9 Plus are usually as you’d pattern them to be on a Samsung flagship, and they sojourn a best screens we can get on any Android phone. The S9 has a 5.8-inch screen, while a S9 Plus has a atmospheric 6.2-inch display. Both are high resolution, both are OLED panels with colourful (sometimes too vibrant) colors, and both have good observation angles. The screens are also somewhat brighter this year, that is always appreciated on balmy days. The display’s extra-tall aspect ratio allows for minimal bezels above and subsequent it, that aids a notice that you’re usually holding a shade in your palm and zero else.

But a S9’s tip and bottom bezels are not as tiny or minimal as those on a iPhone X, a categorical competitor, or a series of other devices. In a time given Samsung done tiny bezels a list stakes feature, other companies have softened on and iterated on a judgment to furnish even some-more immersive designs. Samsung is discerning to tell we that a S9 doesn’t have a nick interrupting a screen, yet it also doesn’t have a many immersive arrangement anymore, either.




The S9 has Samsung’s other hardware standbys, too: quick connected and wireless charging, IP68 H2O resistance, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. If you’re looking for a high-end phone with a headphone jack in 2018, we have fewer choices than ever, so I’m utterly happy to see that Samsung didn’t change this aspect of a phone.

Last year, Samsung debuted a dedicated symbol for a Bixby practical partner on a S8, and it’s in a same mark usually subsequent a volume buttons on a left side on a S9. You can now invalidate it from rising Bixby, that is progress, yet Samsung still doesn’t yield a local approach to reprogram it to something some-more useful. At a worst, it’s annoying, during a best, it’s a tiny pester symbol that we can press yet carrying to worry about it doing something.

So, what is indeed new? Two things: a fingerprint scanner has been changed to a many easier-to-reach mark on a behind of a phone, and a singular orator has been upgraded to a stereo pair.

The S8’s fingerprint scanner was a frustrating experience: it was small, tough to reach, and right subsequent to a camera, that meant many of a time, we finished adult with fingerprints on a camera lens. The S9’s scanner has been changed to usually subsequent a camera, that creates it many easier to reach, generally on a incomparable S9 Plus. It’s still small, generally compared to scanners on other phones, and it’s still too tighten to a camera. I’ve found myself frequently swiping on a camera lens when we try to use a gesticulate to open a presentation tray.

In an apparent try to replicate Apple’s Face ID system, Samsung has introduced a new multiple face-scanning / iris-scanning underline that can be used to clear a phone instead of a fingerprint scanner. It will use possibly a more-secure iris scanner or a quicker-but-less-secure face scanner, depending on a lighting conditions you’re in. However, it’s slow, blinks an irritating red light when it activates a iris scanner, and never feels as seamless as Face ID. Good thing a fingerprint scanner is easier to use now.

The new stereo speakers are some-more successful: they are louder, clearer, and some-more beguiling to listen to than a S8’s singular speaker. Samsung is personification catch-up here — many other phones have had stereo speakers for years now — yet I’m blissful to see (and hear) them finally on a Galaxy phone. They aren’t a best speakers I’ve listened on a phone, yet they are some-more than good enough.

The rest of a S9’s improvements are underneath a hood: it’s regulating Qualcomm’s latest processor (in North America; other markets will see Samsung’s possess Exynos processor), 4GB (S9) or 6GB (S9 Plus) of RAM, and a new LTE modem that supports even faster gigabit speeds. Those are specs we’re expected to see in roughly each Android flagship this year, yet Samsung is a initial with them out of a gate.

Performance, during slightest during my review, has been great: a phone is poignant and responsive, with well-spoken scrolling and quick app launches. The network opening has also been usually as considerable as a S8’s, and noticeably softened than my knowledge with a iPhone.

The distance of a battery and inner storage are unchanged: we get a 3,000mAh battery in a S9 and a 3,500mAh battery in a S9 Plus, with 64GB of storage and microSD label support in both. I’d unequivocally have favourite to see Samsung boost a battery distance this year. The battery life isn’t bad on these phones, yet it’s merely average, and complicated users will exhaust even a S9 Plus’ vast battery after a prolonged day.


The large new thing that Samsung wants everybody to know about is a S9’s new behind camera. The 12-megapixel picture sensor is new and improved, with softened picture processing, yet a vital change is found in a lens, that can now physically switch between a unequivocally splendid f/1.5 orifice and a smaller f/2.4 aperture, identical to how incomparable cameras work. The S9 Plus indication gains a second camera for zooming and mural mode effects, many like Samsung expelled with a Note 8 final year.

Samsung claims poignant low-light improvements with a new camera, interjection to a new lens that can constraint some-more light and softened vigilance estimate to revoke picture noise. In my experience, a S9 can positively take good photos in low light, yet they aren’t indispensably softened than what Google’s Pixel 2 or even a iPhone X can constraint many of a time. There’s reduction sound than images from a S8 and a colors are pleasing.

But all of a images have a specific Samsung “look” to them, that is warmer, unequivocally saturated, and has imperfections (and infrequently detail) smoothed out. It’s utterly opposite than what Apple’s or Google’s cameras furnish and determining between them mostly comes down to personal preference. On a technical level, all of a high-end phones accessible now can constraint glorious photos. Chances are, if we weren’t a fan of Samsung’s picture estimate before, we still won’t like it now.

I’m reduction tender with a switching orifice feature. It feels some-more like a parlor pretence than anything else. The S9’s involuntary mode will switch between a settings formed on lighting conditions, yet a pro mode lets we confirm that orifice we wish to use. Since a camera can usually boost a shiver speed to recompense for some-more light, we don’t know because I’d ever use f/2.4 when an f/1.5 lens is available. I’d rather have a faster shiver speed or reduce ISO environment than a somewhat smaller orifice in substantially any situation.

The ability to switch apertures is enticing, and a element is photographically sound. On a incomparable camera, determining a orifice could outcome in crook images or softened bearing in splendid conditions. It also allows for some-more artistic control to furnish prolonged bearing effects or apart your theme from a background. But those assumptions about incomparable camera lenses don’t directly request to a tiny lenses and sensors found on a phone.

Left picture constraint during f/1.5, right picture prisoner during f/2.4. The differences between them are minimal.

Based on my testing, there isn’t an discernible disproportion in sharpness between a dual apertures. Since a tiny lens and sensor already have unequivocally low depths of field, shutting down a orifice on a S9 has a minimal outcome on what’s in focus. Further, a volume of orifice control supposing isn’t adequate for modernized photography techniques, such as long-exposure shots during a day, so we still have to rest on appendage accessories for those.

The S9 Plus’ second telephoto lens is likewise gimmicky: Samsung’s Live Focus mural mode isn’t as good as Apple or Google’s during separating a theme from a background, and in severe lighting conditions, a picture peculiarity is rather bad. You should buy a S9 Plus over a S9 if we wish a bigger shade or longer battery life, yet not for a second camera lens.

The S9 can fire 4K video during 60 frames per second, or 1080p slow-motion video during 240 frames per second, that catches it adult with what a iPhone can do. (I pattern all Android flagship phones to have these dual video modes this year.) Both modes furnish unequivocally good peculiarity video, yet we have to make certain we have copiousness of light for a slow-motion mode, or you’ll see a lot of picture noise.

On a front camera, things are unvaried from final year. It’s a same 8-megapixel camera as a S8. It has autofocus, that no other front camera has nonetheless to replicate, yet a mural mode and picture peculiarity aren’t as good as Google or Apple’s. By default, a selfie camera relates a lot of picture smoothing and other effects to try to bedeck a photo, yet they usually make it demeanour out of concentration and homely to me.


The S9’s design, performance, and cameras are all predictably good adequate to keep it during a tip of a smartphone raise for 2018. But, Samsung being Samsung, there are a ton of other things it is pulling with a S9 this year, and in my estimation, they all validate as gimmicks. Unsurprisingly, a things that don’t work constantly engage software.

There are AR Emoji, Samsung’s take on a iPhone X’s Animoji feature. It scans your face and afterwards produces a 3D Bitmoji-looking impression formed on 100 points of your face that kind of maybe infrequently looks like you. Then it takes this impression and creates a garland of greeting GIFs with it that we can send by a keyboard. There are also some weird-looking animals that we can emanate video clips with like we can do with Animoji.

There are a integrate issues with Samsung’s AR Emoji. First, Samsung isn’t regulating any special tech to constraint your face or movements, it’s usually relying on a front or behind camera, so tracking is bad. Second, a characters it creates are on a wrong side of creepy, and everybody I’ve tested it with has been totally incited off with a results. The animal characters are likewise weird. It’s unequivocally something that Samsung built usually to contest with Apple, and it’s not unequivocally good.

Next is a new Super Slow Motion mode in a camera. On tip of a 240 frames per second slow-motion constraint formerly mentioned, a S9 can fire adult to 960 frames per second. That sounds unequivocally neat, yet a S9 can usually do it for 0.2 seconds during a time (which stretches to 6 seconds when played back) and during usually 720p resolution. There are dual ways to fire this: we can manually try to trigger it to constraint a 0.2 seconds of transformation we want, or we can use an involuntary mode that looks for transformation in a specific area of a support and captures slow-mo when it detects it. Both are unequivocally tough to use and some-more frustrating than anything else: after 10 takes of perplexing to get a slow-motion shot of my six-year-old throwing a snowball, both her and my calm wore out and we gave up. Worse, a underline needs a ton of light to work, and even if we have that, picture peculiarity is still crappy.


Bixby isn’t new, yet it’s still here, and it’s usually as bad as it was when it launched final summer. It’s gotten a uninformed cloak of paint and it’s somewhat faster than before, yet it’s still approach slower than Google Assistant and isn’t as good during parsing my voice commands. The practical partner has a integrate of new features: there’s an integrated makeup store that lets we try makeup on substantially and afterwards buy it directly from Sephora or Cover Girl, and a calorie showing underline that uses bad science to guesstimate how many calories are in a donut you’re about to eat. (Neither facilities is something we pattern anyone will use some-more than once.) It’s satisfactory to contend that during this point, Bixby is a gigantic disaster as a smartphone assistant.

And afterwards there’s a long-lived censure with Samsung’s software: because are there so many transcribe apps? The unbarred S9 I’ve been contrast has dual email apps, dual gallery apps, dual browsers, and dual app stores. The conduit versions will positively have even some-more duplicative apps. A integrate of Samsung’s apps are good — namely a Samsung browser and Samsung Pay — yet a rest are defective to a Google apps that are also commissioned on a phone, that usually creates them annoying. If we caring during all about program updates, Samsung is one of a misfortune manufacturers when it comes to delivering new versions of Android. As of this review, final year’s Galaxy S8 still doesn’t have Android 8.0 in a US, and that was expelled by Google over 6 months ago.


Without a new pattern or other new apparent advancements in record to confuse from Samsung’s common problems, a program issues on a S9 spin some-more apparent than they were with a S8. The upshot of many of this is that we can omit Samsung’s marketing-focused gimmicks and unequivocally suffer a Galaxy S9 (and nothing of them tumble to a spin of other Android manufacturers’ program problems). You can spin off Bixby, never worry to use AR Emoji or super delayed motion, and invalidate many of Samsung’s apps. That leaves Samsung’s bad program refurbish story as a large adhering indicate for a lot of people.

The rest of a S9 and S9 Plus is as good as we’ve come to expect. It has a head-turning design, quick performance, a good screen, and a unequivocally good camera. Outside of a display, a S9 isn’t a difficulty personality in any category, yet it’s good adequate in all of them that a whole package creates for a good phone.

Owners of a S8 substantially don’t need to ascent this go-around — a differences aren’t good adequate to aver splurging on a S9 — yet if you’re regulating a Galaxy S7 or any other phone from dual years ago, a S9 is a poignant step adult in each respect.

Predictably, Samsung has done nonetheless another glorious flagship phone. But, usually as predictably, it still has copiousness of room for improvement.

Vox Media has associate partnerships. These do not change editorial content, yet Vox Media might acquire commissions for products purchased around associate links. For some-more information, see our ethics policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » appearance » Widgets » and move a widget into Advertise Widget Zone