In Africa, A New Tactic to Suppress Online Speech: Taxing Social Media

Babatunde Okunoye is a investigate officer during Paradigm Initiative. Follow him on Twitter @TOkunoye.

In 2010, protests swept opposite North Africa and a Middle East after a Tunisian businessman self-immolated in criticism of military confiscating his cart. During those protests, activists’ sublime use of amicable media was pivotal in mobilizing a open and eventually toppling strongmen like Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak. Since then, African leaders have incited to increasingly worldly forms of censorship to extent giveaway debate and quell people’s ability to classify around platforms. Their many new strategy: fatiguing people for regulating amicable media. Although African leaders explain they need these taxes to seaside adult supervision revenue, amicable media taxes are merely censorship cloaked in an mercantile argument.

More on:

Central Africa

Social Media

Censorship and Freedom of Expression

To put Africans’ internet use into context: during slightest 213 million Africans use a internet, and 191 million use several amicable media platforms with Facebook, YouTube and Twitter being a many dominant. An successful 2016 news suggested that domestic sermon on Twitter is on a arise in Africa, with Africans carrying a higher rate of domestic tweets than people in a United States and a United Kingdom. 

Aware of a hazard that amicable media poses to their power, odious regimes in Africa have employed several methods to suppress internet-based mobilization. These embody internet shutdowns, targeted amicable media applications shutdowns, website takedowns, endless notice of digital communications, online propaganda, and a apprehension of online critics. Paradigm Initiative’s Digital Rights in Africa reports in 2016, 2017 and 2018 reported during slightest 25 internet or amicable media focus shutdowns in Africa. Its State of Internet Freedom in Nigeria report, that is constructed in partnership with The Open Observatory of Network Interference, disclosed a poignant spike in a series of online critics of supervision arrested in Nigeria between 2016 – 2018.   

In 2018, odious governments adopted nonetheless another tactic: taxes on amicable media usage. In countries such as Uganda, Benin, Tanzania and Zambia, there are now laws in place that levy daily taxes on amicable media and other over-the-top services. In Uganda, for instance, adults have to compensate 200 Ugandan Shillings (US $ 0.05) per day to entrance Facebook, Twitter, or WhatsApp as a law adopted final year. Citizens of Benin have had to compensate 5 CFA francs ($0.008) per megabyte consumed by amicable media platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter as stipulated by Decree No. 2018 – 341 of Jul 25 2018. The direct also introduces a 5 percent fee, on tip of taxes, on texting and calls. These laws also make a cost of progressing personal websites by adults prohibitively expensive. As a outcome of a Electronic and Postal Communications Regulations 2018, adults in Tanzania now contingency compensate a $920 price to accept a government’s accede to say a website.         

The recoil to these taxes has been swift. In Tanzania, polite multitude activists won a temporary authorised challenge to stop a new blogging regulations. However, a supervision interest overturned a progressing justice decision, ensuring a new measures get implemented. Civil multitude activists in a nation have but mounted a new appeal, with a new date set for a conference in Jan 2019. In Benin, after weeks of mass citizen pushback around a amicable media hashtag #TaxePaMesMo (Don’t Tax My MegaBytes) a boss ironically scrapped a taxation with a tweet.

In some cases, people have simply found ways to hedge a new taxes. In Uganda, many have resorted to regulating Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to equivocate profitable a daily fee. As a result, a Ugandan supervision announced skeleton to block VPNs, yet it’s misleading if a supervision will succeed.

More on:

Central Africa

Social Media

Censorship and Freedom of Expression

Most adults believe that these measures were drawn adult to shorten a space for leisure of countenance in worsening tellurian rights contexts in countries like Uganda and Tanzania. Subtle authorised and mercantile persuasions are being deployed to shackle a space for leisure of countenance and citizens’ rights to rivet dynamically with a statute class. While some of these amicable media taxes have been couched as measures to raise supervision revenue, given a bad mercantile conditions prevalent in most of Africa, probably everybody sees them for what they unequivocally are—attempts to suppress a right to leisure of countenance and association of a millions of Africans perfectionist some-more from their governments.

Africa really needs solutions to a mercantile problems. Despite a rich vegetable apparatus endowment, it is a world’s lowest continent. What it doesn’t need, however, are thinly sheltered mercantile policies to suppress individuals’ ability to impugn a government’s many failings on a continent urgently in need of good leadership. Freedom of countenance is a bellwether for other tellurian rights in a society. Wherever leisure of countenance is trampled upon, other tellurian rights are also expected to be disregarded—which is sadly a box in most of Africa.       

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » appearance » Widgets » and move a widget into Advertise Widget Zone