Brexit: PM to move third Brexit understanding opinion to Commons

Media captionHow MPs deserted a no-deal Brexit

Theresa May will make a third try to get her EU withdrawal understanding by Parliament in a subsequent week.

She told MPs that if her understanding fails again to get their backing, a extensive check to Brexit might be needed.

The primary minister’s warning comes forward of a Commons opinion after on either to ask a EU for accede to check Brexit over 29 March.

MPs voted on Wednesday dusk to reject a no-deal Brexit underneath any circumstances.

No date has nonetheless been set for a third supposed “meaningful vote”.

What’s function today?

MPs will opinion on a supervision suit that could see a check to a UK’s depart from a EU.

The UK supervision pronounced there could be a brief check until 30 June, if MPs approve Mrs May’s understanding by 20 Mar – a day before a subsequent EU limit in Brussels.

But BBC domestic editor Laura Kuenssberg pronounced that even if a UK is given until a finish of Jun to pass a legislation compulsory to leave a EU, a supervision will try to do that earlier, if Mrs May’s understanding is upheld subsequent week.

Alternatively, there could be a most longer delay, requiring a UK to take partial in elections for a European Parliament in May, a primary apportion has said, in a eventuality her understanding is not approved.

However, any length of prolongation has to be concluded by a EU.

The DUP – that twice deserted Mrs May’s understanding in a Commons – is holding talks with a government to see if a resolution could be found permitting a MPs to support a PM in a destiny vote.

What happened final night?

In a night of high play on Wednesday, a Commons initial voted on an amendment to reject a UK exiting a EU but a understanding underneath any circumstances, by a domain of four.

That meant a government’s strange suit – that had settled that a UK should not leave a EU but a understanding on 29 Mar – was altered during a final minute.

The supervision had wanted to keep control of a Brexit process, and keep no-deal on a table, so they afterwards systematic Conservative MPs to opinion opposite their possess motion.

That tactic failed. Government ministers defied those orders and there were claims Mrs May had mislaid control of her party.

The updated motion, to reject a no-deal Brexit underneath any circumstances, was upheld by 321 to 278, a infancy of 43.

However, Wednesday’s no-deal opinion is not contracting – underneath stream law a UK could still leave but a understanding on 29 March, unless an prolongation is concluded with a EU.

Please ascent your browser to perspective this interactive

How did my MP opinion on 13 March?

Enter a postcode, or a name or subdivision of your MP

Speaking after a outcome of a opinion was review out, Mrs May said: “The options before us are a same as they always have been.

“The authorised default in EU and UK law is that a UK will leave but a understanding unless something else is agreed. The responsibility is now on each one of us in this House to find out what that is.”

Labour personality Jeremy Corbyn pronounced that Parliament contingency now take control of a Brexit routine and his celebration will work opposite a House of Commons to find a concede solution.

What is a EU saying?

On Thursday morning, European Council boss Donald Tusk tweeted that he would “appeal to a EU27 to be open to a prolonged prolongation if a UK finds it required to rethink a Brexit devise and build accord around it”.

Skip Twitter post by @eucopresident

End of Twitter post by @eucopresident

BBC Europe match Kevin Connolly pronounced that before commendatory any prolongation to Article 50 – a authorised instrument by that a UK will leave a EU – EU leaders would wish to know “how prolonged an prolongation a UK requires and how it proposes to use a time”.

A European Commission orator said: “There are usually dual ways to leave a EU: with or but a deal. The EU is prepared for both.

“To take no understanding off a table, it is not adequate to opinion opposite no understanding – we have to determine to a deal.

“We have concluded a understanding with a primary apportion and a EU is prepared to pointer it.”

How did ministers opinion final night?

Thirteen supervision ministers – including Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd, Business Secretary Greg Clark, Justice Secretary David Gauke and Scottish Secretary David Mundell – defied a supervision whips by abstaining in a vote.

  • The papers: A ‘no-no’ to no-deal and May’s final warning

Work and pensions apportion Sarah Newton voted opposite a orders of a whips and has now resigned.

Mr Mundell pronounced he corroborated a PM’s understanding and had always done transparent his antithesis to a no-deal Brexit.


In a predicament there can be opportunity.

This is now a predicament – a manners that traditionally have recorded governments are out of a window.

The primary apportion has been degraded again. Her management – if not all left – is in shreds.

But for Number 10 there’s an event too, since MPs will shortly be presented with a new choice – behind a PM’s deal, that has already been degraded twice, or accept a possibility of a check to Brexit.

This isn’t a choice of a supervision that’s in control. But a tactic is to make a best of chaos.

Read some-more from Laura here.


What else happened final night?

MPs also voted by 374 to 164 to reject a devise to check a UK’s depart from a EU until 22 May 2019, so that there can be what a supporters call a “managed no-deal” Brexit.

This amendment was famous as a Malthouse Compromise – after Kit Malthouse, a supervision apportion who devised it.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » appearance » Widgets » and move a widget into Advertise Widget Zone